This HTML5 document contains 17 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
marcrelhttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/
vivohttp://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#
n13http://hub.abes.fr/acs/periodical/esthag/
n16http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2244-780X#
n14http://hub.abes.fr/acs/periodical/esthag/2008/volume_42/issue_21/
n6http://hub.abes.fr/acs/periodical/esthag/2008/volume_42/issue_21/101021es800358d/authorship/
n15http://hub.abes.fr/referentiel/acs/documentsubtypename/subject/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
rdachttp://rdaregistry.info/Elements/c/
hubhttp://hub.abes.fr/namespace/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n4http://hub.abes.fr/acs/periodical/esthag/2008/volume_42/issue_21/101021es800358d/m/
rdawhttp://rdaregistry.info/Elements/w/
n10http://hub.abes.fr/referentiel/acs/documenttypename/subject/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n2http://hub.abes.fr/acs/periodical/esthag/2008/volume_42/issue_21/101021es800358d/
Subject Item
n2:w
rdf:type
rdac:C10001 bibo:Article
dcterms:isPartOf
n14:w
dcterms:subject
n10:article n15:environmentalmodeling
dcterms:title
Life Cycle Assessment of an Advanced Bioethanol Technology in the Perspective of Constrained Biomass Availability
rdaw:P10072
n4:print n4:web
vivo:relatedBy
n6:1 n6:3 n6:2
marcrel:aut
n2:hedegaardkarsten n2:thyokathrinea n16:person
dcterms:abstract
The significance of constrained biomass availability in life cycle assessments of bioethanol is illustrated, from a case study of advanced bioethanol production, including fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Among the existing environmental assessments of bioethanol, the studies suggesting an environmental benefit of bioethanol all ignore the constraints on the availability of biomass resources and the implications competition for biomass has on the assessment. We show that toward 2030, regardless of whether a global or European perspective is applied, the amount of biomass, which can become available for bioethanol or other energy uses, will be physically and economically constrained. This implies that use of biomass or land for bioethanol production will most likely happen at the expense of alternative uses. In this perspective, we show that for the case of a new advanced bioethanol technology, in terms of reducing greenhouse emissions and fossil fuel dependency, more is lost than gained when prioritizing biomass or land for bioethanol. Technology pathways involving heat and power production and/or biogas, natural gas or electricity for transport are advantageous.
hub:isPartOfThisJournal
n13:w