Documentation scienceplus.abes.fr version Bêta

À propos de : Electronic Effects in CO Chemisorption on Pt−Pb Intermetallic Surfaces: A Theoretical Study        

AttributsValeurs
type
Is Part Of
Subject
Title
  • Electronic Effects in CO Chemisorption on Pt−Pb Intermetallic Surfaces: A Theoretical Study
has manifestation of work
related by
Author
Abstract
  • The chemisorption of CO on surfaces of Pt−Pb intermetallic compounds, found to be useful as fuel cellelectrocatalysts, was analyzed theoretically. Specifically, density-functional theory and extended Hückel-based calculations on CO adsorption on Pt(111), Pt3Pb(111), and PtPb(0001) surfaces are reported. Bindingenergies on Pt3Pb(111) are computed to be generally smaller than binding energies on Pt(111). The bindingenergies at the 2- and 3-fold sites on Pt3Pb(111) increase if there is a Pb atom underneath the site in thesecond surface layer. The binding energies on PtPb(0001) are much higher than those on the other surfaces.These trends have been analyzed with crystal overlap Hamilton population (COHP)-based energy partitioning.The most stabilizing interaction in chemisorption is the Pt−adsorbate bond formation; the surface and theadsorbate are internally destabilized. The major surface effects are pretty much restricted to the top twolayers. The binding energy trend for the top site chemisorption follows the Pt−adsorbate interaction term(most stabilizing interaction term in chemisorption). This surface Pt−adsorbate interaction term, for top sitechemisorption, has been analyzed further with a Frontier molecular orbital formalism based on the extendedHückel calculations. Electron donation from Pb atoms to Pt atoms plays an important role in distinguishingchemisorption on these surfaces. The higher Fermi energy of the Pt−Pb intermetallic surfaces, relative toPt(111) surface, leads to a weaker Pt−adsorbate interaction, which correlates well with the lower bindingenergy on Pt−Pb intermetallic surfaces when compared to Pt(111). The variation of the binding energy withinthe 2- and 3-fold sites on Pt3Pb(111) cannot be explained by the Pt−adsorbate interaction term alone. Froma detailed COHP analysis of the surface and adsorbate, we find that the adsorption site affects the electronmovements (transfer of electrons) in the surface slab upon chemisorption and through them the overall bindingenergy of the adsorbate. The difference in binding energies between the Pt3Pb(111) hcp and fcc sites can beexplained this way.
article type
is part of this journal



Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata