Documentation scienceplus.abes.fr version Bêta

À propos de : Induced sputum or gastric lavage for community-based diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis?        

AttributsValeurs
type
Is Part Of
Subject
Title
  • Induced sputum or gastric lavage for community-based diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis?
has manifestation of work
related by
Abstract
  • Objectives:. To compare the diagnostic yield of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from induced sputum (IS) and gastric lavage (GL) among children in a community setting. Methods:. Specimen-collection methods for bacteriological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) were compared during a tuberculosis vaccine trial near Cape Town, South Africa (2001-2006). Children with a tuberculosis contact or compatible symptoms were investigated for suspected PTB. Diagnostic yields from 764 paired IS and GL specimens were compared in 191 culture-confirmed cases. Measurements and main results:. The crude yield of M tuberculosis was 10.4%, n = 108 by IS (5.8%) and n = 127 by GL (6.8%), from a total of 194 cases, of which three had incomplete IS/GL specimen pairs. Agreement between IS and GL was poor (κ = 0.31). The comparative yield of a single IS sample (38%) was equivalent to a single GL sample (42%), with a difference in yield of −4% (95% CI −15% to +7%). The combined yield of same-day IS and GL specimens (67%) was equivalent to two consecutive GL specimens (66%), with a difference in yield of 1% (95% CI −9% to 11%), but significantly greater than two consecutive IS specimens (55%), with a difference in yield of 12% (95% CI 2% to 21%). The adjusted odds of a M tuberculosis culture were increased by a positive tuberculin skin test or chest radiograph compatible with PTB. Conclusions:. In this community setting, the diagnostic yield of a single IS sample was equivalent to that of a single GL sample. The optimal diagnostic yield may be obtained from paired IS and GL specimens taken on a single day or two GL specimens taken on consecutive days.
article type
publisher identifier
  • ac136929
Alternative Title
  • Original article
is part of this journal
PubMed ID
  • 18829621



Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata