Documentation scienceplus.abes.fr version Bêta

À propos de : http://hub.abes.fr/cairn/periodical/redp/2006/issue_redp164/D33C6DD2134942A9E053120B220A0474/w        

AttributsValeurs
type
Is Part Of
Subject
Title
  • Pour une approche holiste du filet de sécurité financière dans l’Union Européenne : quelques arguments
has manifestation of work
related by
Contributor
Abstract
  • The case in favor of a holistic approach to a financial safety net in the European Union . As a result of cross-sector and cross-border integration, European financial systems have become more interwoven, both nationally and internationally. More particularly, they have become more complex in terms of risk interdependencies. Financial stability is obviously affected by these financial changes. Based on a critical analysis of the current European prudential framework’s ability to face this new risk profile, we argue in favour of an holistic approach to the financial safety net through the concept of a regulatory regime which is wider than the prevailing set of rules established by regulatory agencies. More precisely, this paper investigates two essential and interdependent aspects of a coherent and global financial safety net in Europe that favours the complementarities between prudential policy in a narrow sense (set of rules established by regulatory agencies, monitoring and supervision), market discipline and bank resolution policy. On one hand, on the basis of the American experience of prompt corrective action policy, we suggest promoting stronger complementarities between public financial regulation and market discipline. On the other hand, we plead for an institutionalisation of insolvency procedures for pan-european financial groups. Indeed, the European situation is characterized by a damaging heterogeneity of national insolvency regimes even though the European Directive on the Reorganization and Winding-Up of Credit Institutions provides a legal framework dealing with the crossborder aspects of European bank insolvency. This Directive undoubtedly represents an important development in the framework of E.U. banking laws but it does not constitute a panacea and does not completely achieve its goals. In particular, it does not eliminate all the conflicts of interest between Member States concerning all the cross border aspects of bank insolvency.
  • Partant d’une analyse critique de la capacité des dispositifs prudentiels européens actuels à faire face aux nouveaux profils de risques liés aux transformations de la finance en Europe - notamment à l’accroissement de l’intégration financière transsecteur et trans-frontière -, nous plaidons dans ce texte pour une conception holiste du filet de sécurité financière. Cette réflexion sur la cohérence de l’architecture globale du cadre prudentiel européen, nous amène à mettre l’accent sur deux éléments essentiels et interdépendants: la nécessaire complémentarité entre régulation publique et discipline de marché et l’institutionnalisation des procédures de faillite de groupes financiers pan-européens.
article type
publisher identifier
  • REDP_164_0471
is part of this journal
issue section title
  • Gouvernance des systèmes financiers
is primary topic of



Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata