Documentation scienceplus.abes.fr version Bêta

À propos de : Crucial aspects of the initial mass function        

AttributsValeurs
type
Is Part Of
Subject
subtitle
  • I. The statistical correlation between the total mass of an ensemble of stars and its most massive star
Title
  • Crucial aspects of the initial mass function
Date
has manifestation of work
related by
Author
Abstract
  • Context. Our understanding of stellar systems depends on the adopted interpretation of the initial mass function, IMF φ( m). Unfortunately, there is not a common interpretation of the IMF, which leads to different methodologies and diverging analysis of observational data. Aims. We study the correlation between the most massive star that a cluster would host, mmax, and its total mass into stars, ℳ, as an example where different views of the IMF lead to different results. Methods. We assume that the IMF is a probability distribution function and analyze the mmax − ℳ correlation within this context. We also examine the meaning of the equation used to derive a theoretical ℳ − \hbox{$\hat{m}_\mathrm{max}$}ℳ −  m̂max relationship, \hbox{${\cal N} \times \int_{\hat{m}_\mathrm{max}}^{m_{\rm up}} \phi(m)\,\mathrm{d}m = 1$}𝒩×∫m̂maxmupφ(m)dm=1 with N the total number of stars in the system, according to different interpretations of the IMF. Results. We find that only a probabilistic interpretation of the IMF, where stellar masses are identically independent distributed random variables, provides a self-consistent result. Neither ℳ nor the total number of stars in the cluster, N, can be used as IMF scaling factors. In addition, \hbox{$\hat{m}_\mathrm{max}$}m̂max is a characteristic maximum stellar mass in the cluster, but not the actual maximum stellar mass. A ⟨ℳ⟩ −  \hbox{$\hat{m}_\mathrm{max}$}⟨ℳ⟩ −  m̂max correlation is a naturalresult of a probabilistic interpretation of the IMF; however, the distribution of observational data in the N (or ℳ) −  mmax plane includes a dependence on the distribution of the total number of stars, N (and ℳ), in the system, Φ N( N), which is not usually taken into consideration. Conclusions. We conclude that a random sampling IMF is not in contradiction to a possible mmax − ℳ physical law. However, such a law cannot be obtained from IMF algebraic manipulation or included analytically in the IMF functional form. The possible physical information that would be obtained from the N (or ℳ) −  mmax correlation is closely linked with the Φ ℳ(ℳ) and Φ N( N) distributions; hence it depends on the star formation process and the assumed definition of stellar cluster.
article type
publisher identifier
  • aa19504-12
Date Copyrighted
Rights
  • © ESO, 2013
Rights Holder
  • ESO
is part of this journal
is primary topic of



Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata