About: Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program: Reply

Documentation

scienceplus.abes.fr version Bêta

scienceplus.abes.fr | explorer

À propos de : Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program: Reply Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

Attributs	Valeurs
type	work Article
Is Part Of	http://hub.abes.fr/oup/periodical/ajae/2005/volume_87/issue_1/w
Subject	slippage effects http://zbw.eu/beta/external_identifiers/jel#q150 http://zbw.eu/beta/external_identifiers/jel#q240 http://zbw.eu/beta/external_identifiers/jel#q280 conservation programs Comments and Replies
Title	Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program: Reply
has manifestation of work	http://hub.abes.fr/oup/periodical/ajae/2005/volume_87/issue_1/101111j00029092200500716x/m/print http://hub.abes.fr/oup/periodical/ajae/2005/volume_87/issue_1/101111j00029092200500716x/m/web
related by	http://hub.abes.fr/oup/periodical/ajae/2005/volume_87/issue_1/101111j00029092200500716x/authorship/1
Author	Wu JunJie
Abstract	Given that the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) costs taxpayers $2 billion per year and remains the largest conservation program in U.S. history, Roberts and Bucholtz are to be commended for revisiting the slippage issue. However, their central point that regional variation in CRP acreage is endogenous is inconsistent with CRP implementation rules and data. Thus, it is not surprising that the null hypothesis of exogeneity cannot be rejected by statistical tests.
article type	reply
is part of this journal	Journal of Farm Economics/Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata