| Abstract
| - H. A. David and C. C. Yang, Iowa State University, have noted the following points. The author does not stay with his own definition of DT(n, q) but in fact uses DT(n,q)=E{T(z1,,ċċċ,zn-q,∞,...,∞)}. Even with this change the proof of the theorem on p. 176 is in error since the combinatorial term associated with δn−r should be (n-qn-r),not(n-qr). However, since δn−r = δn−q, the theorem follows directly from Case 2 of David & Groeneveld (1982), and has essentially been proved by Sen (1985, pp. 309-11).
|
