| Attributs | Valeurs |
|---|
| type
| |
| Is Part Of
| |
| Subject
| |
| Title
| - Pseudoscience as structurally flawed practice: A reply to A.A. Derksen
|
| has manifestation of work
| |
| related by
| |
| Author
| |
| Abstract
| - Summary. I respond to two criticisms levelled by A. A. Derksen in a recent issue of this journal against characterizing pseudoscience as structurally flawed practice: I argue that he surreptitiously invokes this conception, his official view that we should concentrate on pseudoscientists' pretensions rather than their practices notwithstanding; and I critically examine his contention that judgements of scientificity (and pseudoscientificity) cannot properly be made independently of a consideration of whether the relevant theories and practices are empirically well-confirmed.
|
| article type
| |
| publisher identifier
| |
| Date Copyrighted
| |
| Rights Holder
| |
| is part of this journal
| |
