This HTML5 document contains 22 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
vivohttp://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#
marcrelhttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/
n12http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/1988/volume_3/issue_2/B952BE9F9F1B682FE053120B220A0B85/authorship/
n6http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/1988/volume_3/issue_2/B952BE9F9F1B682FE053120B220A0B85/copyrightholder/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
n17http://hub.abes.fr/referentiel/springer/periodical/11606/articletypes/
n10http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/1988/volume_3/issue_2/B952BE9F9F1B682FE053120B220A0B85/subject/
rdachttp://rdaregistry.info/Elements/c/
n2http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/1988/volume_3/issue_2/B952BE9F9F1B682FE053120B220A0B85/
hubhttp://hub.abes.fr/namespace/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n14http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/1988/volume_3/issue_2/B952BE9F9F1B682FE053120B220A0B85/m/
n7http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/1988/volume_3/issue_2/
rdawhttp://rdaregistry.info/Elements/w/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n15http://hub.abes.fr/referentiel/springer/articletypes/
n8http://hub.abes.fr/springer/periodical/11606/
Subject Item
n2:w
rdf:type
rdac:C10001 bibo:Article
dcterms:isPartOf
n7:w
dcterms:subject
n10:geriatrics n10:breastcancer n10:mammography n10:screening
hub:subTitle
A case—Control study
dcterms:title
Screening mammography in the elderly
rdaw:P10072
n14:print n14:web
vivo:relatedBy
n12:2 n12:1
marcrel:aut
n2:hulkabarbaras n2:brownjtrig
dcterms:abstract
Abstract. This case—control study tested the hypothesis that elderly women with metastatic breast cancer were previously screened less than controls. Cases included women over 60 years old who had metastatic breast cancer; the tumor registry provided controls. Identical criteria yielded comparable groups (cases=109, controls=211) receiving primary care at this tertiary center. Radiology and medical records were examined for mammograms; these were blindly categorized “diagnostic,” “screening,” or “indeterminant.” The major, unexpected finding was that less than 6% of controls had ever had screening mammography. The associations between screening and metastatic cancer (odds ratios) suggest a beneficial effect of screening: OR/0.73 for ever screened and OR/0.71 if screened within the year of cancer diagnosis. All confidence intervals include one; however, low screening participation leaves this study with little power. The major implication is that despite the current recommendations, the elderly are not being included in screening mammography programs.
hub:articleType
n15:originalpaper n17:originalarticles
hub:publisher-id
BF02596116
dcterms:dateCopyrighted
1988
dcterms:rightsHolder
n6:societyofgeneralinternalmedicine
hub:isPartOfThisJournal
n8:w