. "Internet Use by Civil Society in Japan, Korea and China (1997-2007): Weighing the Consequences"@en . "HERM_055_0089" . . . "Internet dans la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile\u00A0: premier bilan au Japon, en Cor\u00E9e et en Chine (1997-2007)"@fr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "II. Les formes de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile" . . "Ces dix derni\u00E8res ann\u00E9es, les organisations de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile ont b\u00E9n\u00E9fici\u00E9 de l\u2019utilisation d\u2019Internet qui leur a permis de rationaliser leurs processus d\u2019organisation interne, d\u2019offrir des informations au public et d\u2019\u00E9tendre leurs bases d\u2019adh\u00E9rents. Pourtant, l\u2019utilisation d\u2019Internet par les groupes de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile est in\u00E9gale selon les secteurs. D\u2019apr\u00E8s les r\u00E9sultats de l\u2019enqu\u00EAte de 1997 du J-JIGS 1 (\u00C9tude des groupes d\u2019int\u00E9r\u00EAts au Japon), \u00E0 la fin des ann\u00E9es 1990, seuls 16\u00A0% des groupes japonais de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile dans les r\u00E9gions consid\u00E9r\u00E9es utilisaient l\u2019email, et seulement 12\u00A0% de ces groupes poss\u00E9daient des sites Internet. En 2006-07, l\u2019enqu\u00EAte du J-JIGS 2 (\u00C9tude des groupes d\u2019int\u00E9r\u00EAts [et associations sociales] au Japon - n? 2) constatait que ces chiffres avaient atteint 77,3\u00A0% pour l\u2019utilisation des emails, que 26,3\u00A0% des groupes \u00E9tudi\u00E9s poss\u00E9daient un site Internet destin\u00E9 \u00E0 leurs membres et que 52\u00A0% avaient des sites Internet destin\u00E9s au public. Une enqu\u00EAte sur les organisations de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile en Cor\u00E9e (\u00C9tude des groupes d\u2019int\u00E9r\u00EAts en Cor\u00E9e, ou K-JIGS), \u00E9galement men\u00E9e en 1997, montrait que 31,2\u00A0% d\u2019entre elles utilisaient les emails et que 15,2\u00A0% diffusaient des informations sur des sites Internet. En Chine, des enqu\u00EAtes men\u00E9es en 2001-04 (\u00C9tude des groupes d\u2019int\u00E9r\u00EAts et [organisations sociales] en Chine ou C-JIGS) d\u00E9montraient que l\u2019utilisation des emails \u00E9tait g\u00E9n\u00E9ralis\u00E9e parmi les organisations chinoises de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile (45,3\u00A0%), alors que le d\u00E9veloppement des sites Internet \u00E9tait relativement faible (18,4\u00A0%). Notre comparaison de l\u2019utilisation des emails et des sites Internet par les groupes de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile dans certains secteurs met en \u00E9vidence les diff\u00E9rentes structures de la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 civile dans ces trois pays."@fr . . . . . . "Internet Use by Civil Society in Japan, Korea and China (1997-2007): Weighing the Consequences. In the past decade, the Internet has greatly benefited civil society organisations as a means of streamlining their internal organisational processes, providing information to the public, and expanding their membership. But Internet use has been uneven among civil society groups in certain sectors. According to the results of the 1997 J-JIGS 1 (Japan Interest Group Study) survey, only 16\u00A0% of Japanese civil society groups in the selected regions were using email in the late 1990s and only 12\u00A0% of these groups were maintaining websites. By 2006-07, the 2006-07 J-JIGS 2 (Japan Interest Group [Social Association] Study 2) found that these figures had risen to 77.3\u00A0% for email use, with 26.3\u00A0% of the surveyed groups maintaining websites aimed at members and 52.0\u00A0% maintaining websites aimed at the public. A survey of Korean civil society organizations (Korean Interest Group Survey or K-JIGS) also conducted in 1997 indicated that 31.2\u00A0% were using email and 15.2\u00A0% were disseminating information through websites. In China, surveys conducted in 2001-04 (Chinese Interest Group [Social Organization] Survey or C-JIGS) found that email use was prevalent among Chinese civil society organizations at 45.3\u00A0%, but that website development was rather low at only 18.4\u00A0%. Our comparison of the use of email and websites by civil society groups in certain sectors highlights differences in the structure of civil society in these three countries."@en .